Do you think the subframe adds any safety aspect though. I know it dosen't help with the rigidity of the car but always figured replacing it would be a better safer option compared too removing it.
The reason I want a carbon fiber drive shaft is really more for the lighter rotating mass to allow for faster revs.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
IIRC, there is a safety aspect. Something about directing the engine in a crash. I believe (with 0 evidence, just logic) that any aftermarket subframe will totally eliminate the "safety" aspect as they have closed in what was left open by the engineers. Sure, it'll add rigidity, but I just cant see it having the same "benefit" in impact testing.
As for faster revs... Since the driveshaft is rather compact radially, without much mass (low moment of inertia) you're really not using that much force to accelerate it. All the spinny things add up, such as 4x wheels, 4x rotors, flywheel, clutch, crankshaft, pistons, etc... But I bet the moment of inertia of ONE wheel is about the same as that of the whole driveshaft.
What do you really mean rev faster? Like rev faster in neutral...the driveshaft's not spinning when the clutch is engaged. Faster to redline in first? Most of the work is accelerating the weight of the car, vs spinning the driveshaft and wheels.